<data>
<row _id="1"><Chemical>1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium diethylphosphate</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>2.11</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="2"><Chemical>1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium diethylphosphate</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>0.200507006601622</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="3"><Chemical>1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium diethylphosphate</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>1.47408157603184</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="4"><Chemical>1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium diethylphosphate</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>1.5579581982601103</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="5"><Chemical>2-Ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>1.04</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="6"><Chemical>2-Ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>4.725763568287641</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="7"><Chemical>2-Ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>0.952046720545135</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="8"><Chemical>2-Ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>1.00313766803373</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="9"><Chemical>2,2’,4,4’-Tetrabromodiphenyl ether</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>16.43</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="10"><Chemical>2,2’,4,4’-Tetrabromodiphenyl ether</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>37.47275749468281</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="11"><Chemical>2,2’,4,4’-Tetrabromodiphenyl ether</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>4.379233356637162</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="12"><Chemical>2,2’,4,4’-Tetrabromodiphenyl ether</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>0.820807195506619</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="13"><Chemical>3,3',5,5'-tetrabromobisphenol A</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>21.99</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="14"><Chemical>3,3',5,5'-tetrabromobisphenol A</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>3.7178748024825206</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="15"><Chemical>3,3',5,5'-tetrabromobisphenol A</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>4.373443185166591</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="16"><Chemical>3,3',5,5'-tetrabromobisphenol A</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>22.995461338703304</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="17"><Chemical>3,3',5,5'-tetrabromobisphenol A</Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>2.31</Outcome><Lower>1.62</Lower><Upper>4.69</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="18"><Chemical>5-Fluorouracil</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;30</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="19"><Chemical>5-Fluorouracil</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="20"><Chemical>5-Fluorouracil</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="21"><Chemical>5-Fluorouracil</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;30</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="22"><Chemical>5-Fluorouracil</Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>2.94</Outcome><Lower>1.21</Lower><Upper>52.7</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="23"><Chemical>5-Fluorouracil</Chemical><PMID>21328588</PMID><Author,  year>Mandenius, 2011</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>HL-1</Species/cell type><Measurement>Respiration</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>EC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.36</Outcome><Lower>0.25</Lower><Upper>0.5</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="24"><Chemical>5-Fluorouracil</Chemical><PMID>25034007</PMID><Author,  year>Eskandari, 2014</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>ARVMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>2h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>15.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="25"><Chemical>5-Fluorouracil</Chemical><PMID>24704391</PMID><Author,  year>Lamberti, 2014</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>72h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>400.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="26"><Chemical>5-Fluorouracil</Chemical><PMID>25671635</PMID><Author,  year>Focaccetti, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>HCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>72h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>4.866</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="27"><Chemical>5-Fluorouracil</Chemical><PMID>35101590</PMID><Author,  year>Li, 2022</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>48h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>5.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="28"><Chemical>Aconitine</Chemical><PMID>30410440</PMID><Author,  year>Ma, 2018</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>32.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="29"><Chemical>Aconitine</Chemical><PMID>31975431</PMID><Author,  year>Li, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vivo</Study type><Species/cell type>Zebrafish</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mortality</Measurement><Timepoint>48h</Timepoint><Effect measure>LD50</Effect measure><Outcome>7.92</Outcome><Lower>6.49</Lower><Upper>9.83</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="30"><Chemical>Aconitine</Chemical><PMID>31975431</PMID><Author,  year>Li, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>4.411</Outcome><Lower>3.68</Lower><Upper>5.59</Upper><Unit>mM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="31"><Chemical>Aconitine</Chemical><PMID>18779382</PMID><Author,  year>Wang, 2008</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>Kv2.1</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>1.4</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="32"><Chemical>Aconitine</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Arrhythmia</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IB20</Effect measure><Outcome>0.03</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced =&gt;20% arrhythmic beats in 3 consecutive 20s sweeps.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="33"><Chemical>Aconitine</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>BR20</Effect measure><Outcome>(↑) 0.01 </Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced a reduction in beat rate of =&gt;20% at 3 consecutive sweeps compared with control.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="34"><Chemical>Amitriptyline</Chemical><PMID>25237062</PMID><Author,  year>Scott, 2014</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak amplitude</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>6.65</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Decrease in amplitude</Remarks></row>
<row _id="35"><Chemical>Amitriptyline</Chemical><PMID>25237062</PMID><Author,  year>Scott, 2014</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>6.78</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Decrease in beat rate</Remarks></row>
<row _id="36"><Chemical>Amitriptyline</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ peak count</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.488109566666667</Outcome><Lower>0.22</Lower><Upper>0.7</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Peak count: number of contractions over a period of time.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="37"><Chemical>Amitriptyline</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient width</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.630555512192637</Outcome><Lower>0.26</Lower><Upper>0.99</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Width of the calcium transient</Remarks></row>
<row _id="38"><Chemical>Amitriptyline</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient amplitude</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.489935966666667</Outcome><Lower>0.24</Lower><Upper>0.68</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Peak amplitude of the calcium peak as measurement for contractility</Remarks></row>
<row _id="39"><Chemical>Amitriptyline</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient rise time</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.7650458001160785</Outcome><Lower>0.45</Lower><Upper>0.95</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="40"><Chemical>Amitriptyline</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient decay time</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.5265346341388603</Outcome><Lower>0.31</Lower><Upper>0.75</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="41"><Chemical>Amitriptyline</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient spacing</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.36593444453326907</Outcome><Lower>0.16</Lower><Upper>0.56</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="42"><Chemical>Amitriptyline</Chemical><PMID>28069985</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>3D cardiac microtissue (hiPSC-CMs, hCMECs, hCFs)</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak count</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>4.9971560266446</Outcome><Lower>1.018569383524945</Lower><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Peak count: number of contractions over a period of time.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="43"><Chemical>Amitriptyline</Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>2.9</Outcome><Lower>2.14</Lower><Upper>3.97</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="44"><Chemical>Amitriptyline</Chemical><PMID>27130441</PMID><Author,  year>Stoetzer, 2016</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>NRVMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Nav1.5</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>13.0</Outcome><Lower>12.0</Lower><Upper>14</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="45"><Chemical>Amitriptyline</Chemical><PMID>29239964</PMID><Author,  year>Tsujikawa, 2018</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Guinea pig CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Sodium current</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.39</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="46"><Chemical>Amitriptyline</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Arrhythmia</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IB20</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt; 30 </Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced =&gt;20% arrhythmic beats in 3 consecutive 20s sweeps.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="47"><Chemical>Amitriptyline</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>BR20</Effect measure><Outcome>3.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced a reduction in beat rate of =&gt;20% at 3 consecutive sweeps compared with control.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="48"><Chemical>Amsacrine</Chemical><PMID>1958848</PMID><Author,  year>Dorr, 1991</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>NRCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>3-6h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>30.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µg/(ml h)</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="49"><Chemical>Anthracene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>9.13</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="50"><Chemical>Anthracene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="51"><Chemical>Anthracene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="52"><Chemical>Anthracene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>18.41468005066611</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="53"><Chemical>Anthracene</Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>2.31</Outcome><Lower>1.16</Lower><Upper>12.3</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="54"><Chemical>Arsenic trioxide</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Arrhythmia</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IB20</Effect measure><Outcome>3.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced =&gt;20% arrhythmic beats in 3 consecutive 20s sweeps.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="55"><Chemical>Arsenic trioxide</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>BR20</Effect measure><Outcome>1.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced a reduction in beat rate of =&gt;20% at 3 consecutive sweeps compared with control.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="56"><Chemical>Benz(a)anthracene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>10.78</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="57"><Chemical>Benz(a)anthracene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="58"><Chemical>Benz(a)anthracene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>61.0621878095161</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="59"><Chemical>Benz(a)anthracene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>0.348807682728123</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="60"><Chemical>Benz(a)anthracene</Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>2.57</Outcome><Lower>1.2</Lower><Upper>13.2</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="61"><Chemical>Benzo(a)pyrene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>1.43</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="62"><Chemical>Benzo(a)pyrene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="63"><Chemical>Benzo(a)pyrene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>42.98451393910572</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="64"><Chemical>Benzo(a)pyrene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>2.30172365931584</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="65"><Chemical>Benzo(e)pyrene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>8.32</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="66"><Chemical>Benzo(e)pyrene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="67"><Chemical>Benzo(e)pyrene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>56.156909284493615</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="68"><Chemical>Benzo(e)pyrene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>6.957456397836642</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="69"><Chemical>Benzo(e)pyrene</Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>2.44</Outcome><Lower>1.18</Lower><Upper>11.8</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="70"><Chemical>Benzo(e)pyrene</Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>2.77</Outcome><Lower>1.2</Lower><Upper>18</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="71"><Chemical>Berberine chloride</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>6.24</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="72"><Chemical>Berberine chloride</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>0.59768133641112</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="73"><Chemical>Berberine chloride</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>0.07024175002302288</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="74"><Chemical>Berberine chloride</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>0.01146528847415449</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="75"><Chemical>Berberine chloride</Chemical><PMID>29233041</PMID><Author,  year>Zhang, 2018</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>NRCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak amplitude</Measurement><Timepoint>1.5h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>2.1</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="76"><Chemical>Berberine chloride</Chemical><PMID>16424781</PMID><Author,  year>Menchaca, 2006</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>HEK-293</Species/cell type><Measurement>hERG</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>3.1</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="77"><Chemical>Bisphenol A</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;30</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="78"><Chemical>Bisphenol A</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>27.303798623491115</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="79"><Chemical>Bisphenol A</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>3.8649802059351606</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="80"><Chemical>Bisphenol A</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;30</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="81"><Chemical>Bisphenol A</Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>13.7</Outcome><Lower>5.28</Lower><Upper>51.2</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="82"><Chemical>Bisphenol A</Chemical><PMID>34419494</PMID><Author,  year>Hyun, 2021</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ current</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>6.9</Outcome><Lower>5.800000000000001</Lower><Upper>8</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="83"><Chemical>Bisphenol A</Chemical><PMID>34419494</PMID><Author,  year>Hyun, 2021</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Na+ current</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>56.5</Outcome><Lower>38.6</Lower><Upper>74.4</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="84"><Chemical>Bortezomib</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ATP</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.005</Outcome><Lower>0.004</Lower><Upper>0.005</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>ATP as measurement for mitochondrial dysfunction</Remarks></row>
<row _id="85"><Chemical>Bortezomib</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ΔΨm</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.006</Outcome><Lower>0.005</Lower><Upper>0.006</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>ΔΨm: mitochondrial membrane potential</Remarks></row>
<row _id="86"><Chemical>Bortezomib</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ mobilization</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.06</Outcome><Lower>0.059</Lower><Upper>0.06</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Inhibition of Ca2+ mobilization compared to control</Remarks></row>
<row _id="87"><Chemical>Bortezomib</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ER integrity</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>86.9</Outcome><Lower>86.32</Lower><Upper>87.47</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Measured with ER Tracker (imaging)</Remarks></row>
<row _id="88"><Chemical>Bortezomib</Chemical><PMID>28546047</PMID><Author,  year>Koci, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>20% change</Effect measure><Outcome>0.3</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="89"><Chemical>Bortezomib</Chemical><PMID>28546047</PMID><Author,  year>Koci, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>72h</Timepoint><Effect measure>20% decrease</Effect measure><Outcome>1.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="90"><Chemical>Cadmium (Cd2+)</Chemical><PMID>34255886</PMID><Author,  year>Haverinen, 2021</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Rainbow trout CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ current</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.98</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>L-type Ca2+ current (ICaL)</Remarks></row>
<row _id="91"><Chemical>Cadmium (Cd2+)</Chemical><PMID>34255886</PMID><Author,  year>Haverinen, 2021</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Rainbow trout CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Na+ current</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>261.3</Outcome><Lower>188.10000000000002</Lower><Upper>334.5</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="92"><Chemical>Carbachol</Chemical><PMID>11750078</PMID><Author,  year>Howard, 2002</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Rat cardiac membrane</Species/cell type><Measurement>Muscarinic receptor binding</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>7.0</Outcome><Lower>4.0</Lower><Upper>12</Upper><Unit>nM</Unit><Remarks>Adult rat cardiac membrane</Remarks></row>
<row _id="93"><Chemical>Carbachol</Chemical><PMID>11750078</PMID><Author,  year>Howard, 2002</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Rat cardiac membrane</Species/cell type><Measurement>Muscarinic receptor binding</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>20.0</Outcome><Lower>9.0</Lower><Upper>44</Upper><Unit>nM</Unit><Remarks>Neonatal rat cardiac membrane</Remarks></row>
<row _id="94"><Chemical>Chlorpyrifos</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;30</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="95"><Chemical>Chlorpyrifos</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>47.62225939818692</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="96"><Chemical>Chlorpyrifos</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>12.384918691990402</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="97"><Chemical>Chlorpyrifos</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>22.57527340474811</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="98"><Chemical>Chlorpyrifos</Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>7.04</Outcome><Lower>3.37</Lower><Upper>23.7</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="99"><Chemical>Chlorpyrifos</Chemical><PMID>11750078</PMID><Author,  year>Howard, 2002</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Rat cardiac membrane</Species/cell type><Measurement>Muscarinic receptor binding</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>7.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>nM</Unit><Remarks>Adult rat cardiac membrane</Remarks></row>
<row _id="100"><Chemical>Chlorpyrifos</Chemical><PMID>11750078</PMID><Author,  year>Howard, 2002</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Rat cardiac membrane</Species/cell type><Measurement>Muscarinic receptor binding</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>15.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>nM</Unit><Remarks>Neonatal rat cardiac membrane</Remarks></row>
<row _id="101"><Chemical>Chlorpyrifos-methyl</Chemical><PMID>19674799</PMID><Author,  year>Tryfonos, 2009</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Sparus aurata</Species/cell type><Measurement>Contractility</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>93.7</Outcome><Lower>89.7</Lower><Upper>97.9</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="102"><Chemical>Cocaine</Chemical><PMID>16406254</PMID><Author,  year>Ma, 2006</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Guinea pig CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Sodium current</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>45.9</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>15 μM suppressed AP upstroke velocity from ∼22 mV/ms to less than 5 mV/ms</Remarks></row>
<row _id="103"><Chemical>Cresyl diphenyl phosphate (CDP)</Chemical><PMID>25661707</PMID><Author,  year>Du, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vivo</Study type><Species/cell type>Zebrafish</Species/cell type><Measurement>Pericardium effusion</Measurement><Timepoint>96h</Timepoint><Effect measure>EC50</Effect measure><Outcome>1.12</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="104"><Chemical>Daunorubicin</Chemical><PMID>1958848</PMID><Author,  year>Dorr, 1991</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>NRCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>3-6h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>16.5</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µg/(ml h)</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="105"><Chemical>Daunorubicin</Chemical><PMID>21328588</PMID><Author,  year>Mandenius, 2011</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>HL-1</Species/cell type><Measurement>Respiration</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>EC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.12</Outcome><Lower>0.12</Lower><Upper>0.14</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Oxygen uptake rates, or respiration, provide direct information on the metabolic activity in cells and therefore on cellular homeostasis.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="106"><Chemical>Daunorubicin</Chemical><PMID>33719006</PMID><Author,  year>Bozza, 2021</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>48h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.33</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="107"><Chemical>Daunorubicin</Chemical><PMID>21046361</PMID><Author,  year>Vavrova, 2011</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.48</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="108"><Chemical>Daunorubicin</Chemical><PMID>17587482</PMID><Author,  year>Adamcova, 2007</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>NRVMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>72h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.55</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="109"><Chemical>Daunorubicin</Chemical><PMID>31650569</PMID><Author,  year>Gwarda, 2019</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.64</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="110"><Chemical>Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate </Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;30</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="111"><Chemical>Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate </Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="112"><Chemical>Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate </Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>12.218047963208406</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="113"><Chemical>Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate </Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>5.883878124999231</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="114"><Chemical>Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate </Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>1000.0</Outcome><Lower>1.53</Lower><Upper>457000</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="115"><Chemical>Diazinon</Chemical><PMID>19674799</PMID><Author,  year>Tryfonos, 2009</Author,  year><Study type>in vivo</Study type><Species/cell type>Sparus aurata</Species/cell type><Measurement>Contractility</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>164.0</Outcome><Lower>458.0</Lower><Upper>170</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="116"><Chemical>Dibenz(a,c)anthracene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;30</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="117"><Chemical>Dibenz(a,c)anthracene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="118"><Chemical>Dibenz(a,c)anthracene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="119"><Chemical>Dibenz(a,c)anthracene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>11.9864929394371</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="120"><Chemical>Dibenz(a,c)anthracene</Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>8.56</Outcome><Lower>2.72</Lower><Upper>47.6</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="121"><Chemical>Dieldrin</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>0.76</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="122"><Chemical>Dieldrin</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>0.21827059281214095</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="123"><Chemical>Dieldrin</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>1.07628932709562</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="124"><Chemical>Dieldrin</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>0.47321013894299896</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="125"><Chemical>Dieldrin</Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>2.38</Outcome><Lower>1.17</Lower><Upper>12.7</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="126"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ATP</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.003</Outcome><Lower>0.002</Lower><Upper>0.003</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>ATP as measurement for mitochondrial dysfunction</Remarks></row>
<row _id="127"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ΔΨm</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>10.6</Outcome><Lower>10.52</Lower><Upper>10.67</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>ΔΨm: mitochondrial membrane potential</Remarks></row>
<row _id="128"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ mobilization</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>40.78</Outcome><Lower>40.5</Lower><Upper>41.05</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Inhibition of Ca2+ mobilization compared to control</Remarks></row>
<row _id="129"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ER integrity</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Measured with ER Tracker (imaging)</Remarks></row>
<row _id="130"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>25237062</PMID><Author,  year>Scott, 2014</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak amplitude</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>4.75</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Decrease in amplitude</Remarks></row>
<row _id="131"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>25237062</PMID><Author,  year>Scott, 2014</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>4.75</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Decrease in beat rate</Remarks></row>
<row _id="132"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ peak count</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Peak count: number of contractions over a period of time.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="133"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient width</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>40.76670598599155</Outcome><Lower>38.06</Lower><Upper>42.07</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Width of the calcium transient</Remarks></row>
<row _id="134"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient amplitude</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Peak amplitude of the calcium peak as measurement for contractility</Remarks></row>
<row _id="135"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient rise time</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>3.6320612638864014</Outcome><Lower>2.14</Lower><Upper>5.12</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="136"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient decay time</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>13.885542841387224</Outcome><Lower>3.38</Lower><Upper>23.45</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="137"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient spacing</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="138"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>28069985</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>3D cardiac microtissue (hiPSC-CMs, hCMECs, hCFs)</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak count</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>47.698821102022904</Outcome><Lower>3.37782831788947</Lower><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Peak count: number of contractions over a period of time.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="139"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>35488128</PMID><Author,  year>Gryshovka, 2022</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>3.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="140"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>1958848</PMID><Author,  year>Dorr, 1991</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>NRCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>3-6h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>5.72</Outcome><Lower> </Lower><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µg/(ml h)</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="141"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>28546047</PMID><Author,  year>Koci, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>20% change</Effect measure><Outcome>3.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="142"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>28546047</PMID><Author,  year>Koci, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>72h</Timepoint><Effect measure>20% decrease</Effect measure><Outcome>3.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="143"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>21328588</PMID><Author,  year>Mandenius, 2011</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>HL-1</Species/cell type><Measurement>Respiration</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>EC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.43</Outcome><Lower>0.38</Lower><Upper>0.5</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="144"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>33719006</PMID><Author,  year>Bozza, 2021</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>48h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.54</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="145"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>28300219</PMID><Author,  year>Zhao, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>48h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>3.5</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="146"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>31650569</PMID><Author,  year>Gwarda, 2019</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.65</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="147"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>34525346</PMID><Author,  year>Magdy, 2021</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>72h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>2.622</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="148"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>34525346</PMID><Author,  year>Magdy, 2021</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Caspase 3/7 activity</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>EC50</Effect measure><Outcome>2.078</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="149"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>34525346</PMID><Author,  year>Magdy, 2021</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ROS</Measurement><Timepoint>72h</Timepoint><Effect measure>EC50</Effect measure><Outcome>10.35</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="150"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>31797733</PMID><Author,  year>Weng, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Organ on chip incl. hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint>48h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.04107</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Normalized rate change (%), R2 = 0.79.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="151"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>31797733</PMID><Author,  year>Weng, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Organ on chip incl. hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint>48h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.2298</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Normalized Max. rate change (%), R2 = 0.82.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="152"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>32185414</PMID><Author,  year>Karhu, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>48h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.8</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>R2 = 0.83.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="153"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>32185414</PMID><Author,  year>Karhu, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>NRVMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>48h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.48</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>R2 = 0.98. </Remarks></row>
<row _id="154"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>24704391</PMID><Author,  year>Lamberti, 2014</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>72h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.12</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="155"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>15273722</PMID><Author,  year>Kluza, 2004</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.9</Outcome><Lower>0.89</Lower><Upper>0.91</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="156"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Arrhythmia</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IB20</Effect measure><Outcome>1.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced =&gt;20% arrhythmic beats in 3 consecutive 20s sweeps.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="157"><Chemical>Doxorubicin</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>BR20</Effect measure><Outcome>10.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced a reduction in beat rate of =&gt;20% at 3 consecutive sweeps compared with control.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="158"><Chemical>Endosulfan</Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>3.81</Outcome><Lower>2.3</Lower><Upper>7.22</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="159"><Chemical>5-Fluorouracil</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ATP</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>93.0</Outcome><Lower>92.38</Lower><Upper>93.61</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>ATP as measurement for mitochondrial dysfunction</Remarks></row>
<row _id="160"><Chemical>5-Fluorouracil</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ΔΨm</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.09</Outcome><Lower>0.089</Lower><Upper>0.09</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>ΔΨm: mitochondrial membrane potential</Remarks></row>
<row _id="161"><Chemical>5-Fluorouracil</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ mobilization</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.03</Outcome><Lower>0.037</Lower><Upper>0.038</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Inhibition of Ca2+ mobilization compared to control</Remarks></row>
<row _id="162"><Chemical>5-Fluorouracil</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ER integrity</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.06</Outcome><Lower>0.05</Lower><Upper>0.06</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Measured with ER Tracker (imaging)</Remarks></row>
<row _id="163"><Chemical>5-Fluorouracil</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Arrhythmia</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IB20</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt; 30 </Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced =&gt;20% arrhythmic beats in 3 consecutive 20s sweeps.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="164"><Chemical>5-Fluorouracil</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>BR20</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt; 30 </Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced a reduction in beat rate of =&gt;20% at 3 consecutive sweeps compared with control.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="165"><Chemical>Idarubicin</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ATP</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.13</Outcome><Lower>0.12</Lower><Upper>0.13</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>ATP as measurement for mitochondrial dysfunction</Remarks></row>
<row _id="166"><Chemical>Idarubicin</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ΔΨm</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.013</Outcome><Lower>0.012</Lower><Upper>0.013</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>ΔΨm: mitochondrial membrane potential</Remarks></row>
<row _id="167"><Chemical>Idarubicin</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ mobilization</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.0134</Outcome><Lower>0.0133</Lower><Upper>0.0134</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Inhibition of Ca2+ mobilization compared to control</Remarks></row>
<row _id="168"><Chemical>Idarubicin</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ER integrity</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.002</Outcome><Lower>0.001</Lower><Upper>0.002</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Measured with ER Tracker (imaging)</Remarks></row>
<row _id="169"><Chemical>Idarubicin</Chemical><PMID>1958848</PMID><Author,  year>Dorr, 1991</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>NRCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>3-6h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.84</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µg/(ml h)</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="170"><Chemical>Idarubicin</Chemical><PMID>33719006</PMID><Author,  year>Bozza, 2021</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>48h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.25</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="171"><Chemical>Idarubicin</Chemical><PMID>34787021</PMID><Author,  year>Zhang, 2021</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hl-1</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>7.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="172"><Chemical>Idarubicin</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Arrhythmia</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IB20</Effect measure><Outcome>0.3</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced =&gt;20% arrhythmic beats in 3 consecutive 20s sweeps.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="173"><Chemical>Idarubicin</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>BR20</Effect measure><Outcome>3.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced a reduction in beat rate of =&gt;20% at 3 consecutive sweeps compared with control.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="174"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ATP</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>15.7</Outcome><Lower>15.59</Lower><Upper>15.8</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>ATP as measurement for mitochondrial dysfunction</Remarks></row>
<row _id="175"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ΔΨm</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>26.0</Outcome><Lower>25.82</Lower><Upper>26.17</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>ΔΨm: mitochondrial membrane potential</Remarks></row>
<row _id="176"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ mobilization</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>20.4</Outcome><Lower>20.26</Lower><Upper>20.53</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Inhibition of Ca2+ mobilization compared to control</Remarks></row>
<row _id="177"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ER integrity</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>52.0</Outcome><Lower>51.65</Lower><Upper>52.34</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Measured with ER Tracker (imaging)</Remarks></row>
<row _id="178"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>35488128</PMID><Author,  year>Gryshovka, 2022</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC20</Effect measure><Outcome>30.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="179"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>28315715</PMID><Author,  year>Chambers, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>26.2</Outcome><Lower>19.1</Lower><Upper>33.3</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="180"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>30910525</PMID><Author,  year>Burke, 2019</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Rat CFs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>14.8</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="181"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>30910525</PMID><Author,  year>Burke, 2019</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Rat CFs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>48h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>11.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="182"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>22641616</PMID><Author,  year>Hu, 2012</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>NRCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ATP</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>LOAEL</Effect measure><Outcome>12.5</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that caused significant change from the vehicle control</Remarks></row>
<row _id="183"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>22641616</PMID><Author,  year>Hu, 2012</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>NRCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>LDH</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>LOAEL</Effect measure><Outcome>25.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="184"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>22641616</PMID><Author,  year>Hu, 2012</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>NRCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Caspase 3/7 activity</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>LOAEL</Effect measure><Outcome>12.5</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="185"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>22641616</PMID><Author,  year>Hu, 2012</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>NRCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ΔΨm</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>LOAEL</Effect measure><Outcome>25.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="186"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>22641616</PMID><Author,  year>Hu, 2012</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>NRCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>XBP1 splicing</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>LOAEL</Effect measure><Outcome>10.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="187"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>22641616</PMID><Author,  year>Hu, 2012</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>NRCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>CHOP induction</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>LOAEL</Effect measure><Outcome>10.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="188"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>18664550</PMID><Author,  year>Will, 2008</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>ATP</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>30.53</Outcome><Lower>29.07</Lower><Upper>31.99</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Glucose containing media</Remarks></row>
<row _id="189"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>18664550</PMID><Author,  year>Will, 2008</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>ATP</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>29.17</Outcome><Lower>27.4</Lower><Upper>30.94</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Galactose containing media</Remarks></row>
<row _id="190"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>18664550</PMID><Author,  year>Will, 2008</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>Complex 1 activity</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;300</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="191"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>18664550</PMID><Author,  year>Will, 2008</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>Complex 5 activity</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>190.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="192"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>35216404</PMID><Author,  year>Bouitbir, 2022</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>ATP</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>19.5</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Glucose containing media</Remarks></row>
<row _id="193"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>35216404</PMID><Author,  year>Bouitbir, 2022</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>ATP</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>22.3</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Galactose containing media</Remarks></row>
<row _id="194"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Arrhythmia</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IB20</Effect measure><Outcome>30.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced =&gt;20% arrhythmic beats in 3 consecutive 20s sweeps.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="195"><Chemical>Imatinib</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>BR20</Effect measure><Outcome>10.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced a reduction in beat rate of =&gt;20% at 3 consecutive sweeps compared with control.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="196"><Chemical>Lead chloride</Chemical><PMID>28836190</PMID><Author,  year>Mattos, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vivo</Study type><Species/cell type>Guinea pig heart</Species/cell type><Measurement>Contractility</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>55.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Amplitude of contraction (tension in gf/cm2)</Remarks></row>
<row _id="197"><Chemical>Lead chloride</Chemical><PMID>28836190</PMID><Author,  year>Mattos, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Guinea pig CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ current</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>18.0</Outcome><Lower>10.0</Lower><Upper>26</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Cav1.2 channel (ICa)</Remarks></row>
<row _id="198"><Chemical>Lindane</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;30</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="199"><Chemical>Lindane</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>12.142755544523702</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="200"><Chemical>Lindane</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>3.6574232703683207</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="201"><Chemical>Lindane</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>14.524658940031504</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="202"><Chemical>Lindane</Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>5.72</Outcome><Lower>1.89</Lower><Upper>4380</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="203"><Chemical>Loperamide</Chemical><PMID>27530870</PMID><Author,  year>Kang, 2016</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>HEK-293</Species/cell type><Measurement>Nav1.5</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>297.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>nM</Unit><Remarks>Holding potential of -90 mV</Remarks></row>
<row _id="204"><Chemical>Loperamide</Chemical><PMID>27530870</PMID><Author,  year>Kang, 2016</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>HEK-293</Species/cell type><Measurement>Nav1.5</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>239.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>nM</Unit><Remarks>Holding potential of -70 mV</Remarks></row>
<row _id="205"><Chemical>Loperamide</Chemical><PMID>27530870</PMID><Author,  year>Kang, 2016</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>HEK-293</Species/cell type><Measurement>hERG</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>89.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>nM</Unit><Remarks>Room temperature</Remarks></row>
<row _id="206"><Chemical>Loperamide</Chemical><PMID>27530870</PMID><Author,  year>Kang, 2016</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>HEK-293</Species/cell type><Measurement>hERG</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>33.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>nM</Unit><Remarks>Physiological temperature</Remarks></row>
<row _id="207"><Chemical>Mitomycin A</Chemical><PMID>1458553</PMID><Author,  year>Dorr, 1992</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>NRCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>3h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>2.1</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="208"><Chemical>Mitomycin C</Chemical><PMID>1458553</PMID><Author,  year>Dorr, 1992</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>NRCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>3h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;274</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="209"><Chemical>Mitoxantrone</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ATP</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.4</Outcome><Lower>0.39</Lower><Upper>0.4</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>ATP as measurement for mitochondrial dysfunction</Remarks></row>
<row _id="210"><Chemical>Mitoxantrone</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ΔΨm</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>3.2</Outcome><Lower>3.17</Lower><Upper>3.22</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>ΔΨm: mitochondrial membrane potential</Remarks></row>
<row _id="211"><Chemical>Mitoxantrone</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ mobilization</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>3.3</Outcome><Lower>3.27</Lower><Upper>3.32</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Inhibition of Ca2+ mobilization compared to control</Remarks></row>
<row _id="212"><Chemical>Mitoxantrone</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ER integrity</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>3.4</Outcome><Lower>3.37</Lower><Upper>3.42</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Measured with ER Tracker (imaging)</Remarks></row>
<row _id="213"><Chemical>Mitoxantrone</Chemical><PMID>1958848</PMID><Author,  year>Dorr, 1991</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>NRCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>3-6h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>4.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µg/(ml h)</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="214"><Chemical>Mitoxantrone</Chemical><PMID>28546047</PMID><Author,  year>Koci, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>20% change</Effect measure><Outcome>1.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="215"><Chemical>Mitoxantrone</Chemical><PMID>28546047</PMID><Author,  year>Koci, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>72h</Timepoint><Effect measure>20% decrease</Effect measure><Outcome>1.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="216"><Chemical>Mitoxantrone</Chemical><PMID>23261645</PMID><Author,  year>Schweikart, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>1h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>127.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="217"><Chemical>Mitoxantrone</Chemical><PMID>23261645</PMID><Author,  year>Schweikart, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>12h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>3.1</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="218"><Chemical>Mitoxantrone</Chemical><PMID>23261645</PMID><Author,  year>Schweikart, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>72h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.5</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="219"><Chemical>Mitoxantrone</Chemical><PMID>23261645</PMID><Author,  year>Schweikart, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ATP</Measurement><Timepoint>72h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.8</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="220"><Chemical>Mitoxantrone</Chemical><PMID>15273722</PMID><Author,  year>Kluza, 2004</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>1.6</Outcome><Lower>1.3</Lower><Upper>1.9</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="221"><Chemical>Mitoxantrone</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Arrhythmia</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IB20</Effect measure><Outcome>3.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced =&gt;20% arrhythmic beats in 3 consecutive 20s sweeps.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="222"><Chemical>Mitoxantrone</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>BR20</Effect measure><Outcome>0.3</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced a reduction in beat rate of =&gt;20% at 3 consecutive sweeps compared with control.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="223"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>22972846</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.12</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="224"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ATP</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>ATP as measurement for mitochondrial dysfunction</Remarks></row>
<row _id="225"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ΔΨm</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>ΔΨm: mitochondrial membrane potential</Remarks></row>
<row _id="226"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ mobilization</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Inhibition of Ca2+ mobilization compared to control</Remarks></row>
<row _id="227"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>23315586</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hESC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>ER integrity</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Measured with ER Tracker (imaging)</Remarks></row>
<row _id="228"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>25219538</PMID><Author,  year>Gibson, 2014</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ current</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.039</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>After acute exposure</Remarks></row>
<row _id="229"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>25237062</PMID><Author,  year>Scott, 2014</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak amplitude</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>7.37</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Decrease in amplitude</Remarks></row>
<row _id="230"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>25237062</PMID><Author,  year>Scott, 2014</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>2.27</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>in % of control because plateau was not reached, EC50 could not be calculated</Remarks></row>
<row _id="231"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ current</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.93</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Calcium channel inhibitor</Remarks></row>
<row _id="232"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ peak count</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.933096566666667</Outcome><Lower>0.38</Lower><Upper>1.72</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Peak count: number of contractions over a period of time.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="233"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient width</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>1.2886851277115852</Outcome><Lower>0.86</Lower><Upper>1.7</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Width of the calcium transient</Remarks></row>
<row _id="234"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient amplitude</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.361144833333333</Outcome><Lower>0.24</Lower><Upper>0.46</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Peak amplitude of the calcium peak as measurement for contractility</Remarks></row>
<row _id="235"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient rise time</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.6551296611460257</Outcome><Lower>0.4</Lower><Upper>0.8</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="236"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient decay time</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>1.4163737617107073</Outcome><Lower>0.11</Lower><Upper>6.14</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="237"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient spacing</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.2542488299647862</Outcome><Lower>0.03</Lower><Upper>0.84</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="238"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>28069985</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>3D cardiac microtissue (hiPSC-CMs, hCMECs, hCFs)</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak count</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.034119446326348994</Outcome><Lower>0.005484630147128975</Lower><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Peak count: number of contractions over a period of time.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="239"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>31385592</PMID><Author,  year>Feric, 2019</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>3D cardiac microtissue (hiPSC-CMs, cardiac fibroblasts)</Species/cell type><Measurement>Contractility</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>62.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>nM</Unit><Remarks>Change in contractile force</Remarks></row>
<row _id="240"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>20.8</Outcome><Lower>8.7</Lower><Upper>67.4</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="241"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>33813278</PMID><Author,  year>Lee, 2021</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak amplitude</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.3</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Parameter of contractile force.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="242"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>21328588</PMID><Author,  year>Mandenius, 2011</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>HL-1</Species/cell type><Measurement>Respiration</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>EC50</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;1000</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="243"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Arrhythmia</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IB20</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt; 3 </Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced =&gt;20% arrhythmic beats in 3 consecutive 20s sweeps.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="244"><Chemical>Nifedipine</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>BR20</Effect measure><Outcome>(↑) 0.1 </Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced a reduction in beat rate of =&gt;20% at 3 consecutive sweeps compared with control.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="245"><Chemical>Paraoxon</Chemical><PMID>19674799</PMID><Author,  year>Tryfonos, 2009</Author,  year><Study type>in vivo</Study type><Species/cell type>Sparus aurata</Species/cell type><Measurement>Contractility</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>3.2</Outcome><Lower>3.17</Lower><Upper>3.32</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="246"><Chemical>Parathion</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>15.09</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="247"><Chemical>Parathion</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>7.462307505897089</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="248"><Chemical>Parathion</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>3.58245730566495</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="249"><Chemical>Parathion</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>12.321953100837701</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="250"><Chemical>Parathion-methyl</Chemical><PMID>19674799</PMID><Author,  year>Tryfonos, 2009</Author,  year><Study type>in vivo</Study type><Species/cell type>Sparus aurata</Species/cell type><Measurement>Contractility</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>80.3</Outcome><Lower>75.16</Lower><Upper>85.7</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="251"><Chemical>Permethrin</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;30</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="252"><Chemical>Permethrin</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="253"><Chemical>Permethrin</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>0.07997352002027538</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="254"><Chemical>Permethrin</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>0.337715562209982</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="255"><Chemical>Permethrin</Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>2.49</Outcome><Lower>1.21</Lower><Upper>12.6</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="256"><Chemical>Phenanthrene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;30</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="257"><Chemical>Phenanthrene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>33.29727119738452</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="258"><Chemical>Phenanthrene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>8.049186382259762</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="259"><Chemical>Phenanthrene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>22.17945338031911</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="260"><Chemical>Phenanthrene</Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>37.5</Outcome><Lower>4.08</Lower><Upper>836</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="261"><Chemical>Phenanthrene</Chemical><PMID>33906022</PMID><Author,  year>Abramochkin, 2021</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Navaga cod CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>K+ current</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>1.95</Outcome><Lower>1.85</Lower><Upper>2.05</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Atrial Ikr potassium current</Remarks></row>
<row _id="262"><Chemical>Phenanthrene</Chemical><PMID>33906022</PMID><Author,  year>Abramochkin, 2021</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Navaga cod CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>K+ current</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>2.2</Outcome><Lower>1.9</Lower><Upper>2.5</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Ventricular Ikr potassium current</Remarks></row>
<row _id="263"><Chemical>Pyrene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;30</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="264"><Chemical>Pyrene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;100</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="265"><Chemical>Pyrene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>2.1992719630538</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="266"><Chemical>Pyrene</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>4.0062179400930304</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="267"><Chemical>Pyrene</Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>2.36</Outcome><Lower>1.17</Lower><Upper>12.3</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="268"><Chemical>Rosiglitazone</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Arrhythmia</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IB20</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt; 30 </Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced =&gt;20% arrhythmic beats in 3 consecutive 20s sweeps.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="269"><Chemical>Rosiglitazone</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>BR20</Effect measure><Outcome>(↑)1 </Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced a reduction in beat rate of =&gt;20% at 3 consecutive sweeps compared with control.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="270"><Chemical>Rosiglitazone</Chemical><PMID>24249632</PMID><Author,  year>Mishra, 2014</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>55.0</Outcome><Lower>50.0</Lower><Upper>60</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="271"><Chemical>Rosiglitazone</Chemical><PMID>21774756</PMID><Author,  year>Szebeni, 2011</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Canine VCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ito</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>25.2</Outcome><Lower>22.5</Lower><Upper>27.9</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Ito: Cardiac transient outward potassium current</Remarks></row>
<row _id="272"><Chemical>Rosiglitazone</Chemical><PMID>21774756</PMID><Author,  year>Szebeni, 2011</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Canine VCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ikr</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>72.3</Outcome><Lower>63.0</Lower><Upper>81.6</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Ikr: Rapid delayed rectifier potassium current</Remarks></row>
<row _id="273"><Chemical>Rosiglitazone</Chemical><PMID>21774756</PMID><Author,  year>Szebeni, 2011</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Canine VCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ current</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>82.5</Outcome><Lower>73.1</Lower><Upper>91.9</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="274"><Chemical>Sibutramine</Chemical><PMID>18781376</PMID><Author,  year>Kim, 2009</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>HEK-293</Species/cell type><Measurement>hERG</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>2.5</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>At -40 mV</Remarks></row>
<row _id="275"><Chemical>Sibutramine</Chemical><PMID>18829731</PMID><Author,  year>Kim, 2008</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>CHO cells</Species/cell type><Measurement>hERG</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>2.41</Outcome><Lower>1.9</Lower><Upper>2.9</Upper><Unit>µg/mL</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="276"><Chemical>Sibutramine</Chemical><PMID>18829731</PMID><Author,  year>Kim, 2008</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>ARVMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Na+ current</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>7.72</Outcome><Lower>5.98</Lower><Upper>9.46</Upper><Unit>µg/mL</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="277"><Chemical>Sibutramine</Chemical><PMID>18829731</PMID><Author,  year>Kim, 2008</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>ARVMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ current</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>2.79</Outcome><Lower>2.32</Lower><Upper>3.26</Upper><Unit>µg/mL</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="278"><Chemical>Tebuconazole</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt;30</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="279"><Chemical>Tebuconazole</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>34.886491754886805</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="280"><Chemical>Tebuconazole</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>7.820019423184851</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="281"><Chemical>Tebuconazole</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>10.027007638969604</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="282"><Chemical>Tebuconazole</Chemical><PMID>32798748</PMID><Author,  year>Othmene, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>H9c2</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>50.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="283"><Chemical>Tebuconazole</Chemical><PMID>35202779</PMID><Author,  year>Miranda, 2022</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Mouse VCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ current</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>33.2</Outcome><Lower>25.800000000000004</Lower><Upper>40.6</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>L-type calcium channel inhibitor</Remarks></row>
<row _id="284"><Chemical>Tebuconazole</Chemical><PMID>35202779</PMID><Author,  year>Miranda, 2022</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Mouse VCMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>K+ current</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>5.7</Outcome><Lower>4.2</Lower><Upper>7.2</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>IK potassium current inhibition</Remarks></row>
<row _id="285"><Chemical>Telmisartan</Chemical><PMID>23073892</PMID><Author,  year>Kim, 2012</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Rat isolated heart</Species/cell type><Measurement>Infarction size</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>EC50</Effect measure><Outcome>48.1</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="286"><Chemical>Telmisartan</Chemical><PMID>18664324</PMID><Author,  year>Tu, 2008</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Oocytes</Species/cell type><Measurement>hKv1.5</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>2.25</Outcome><Lower>1.28</Lower><Upper>3.22</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Peak current</Remarks></row>
<row _id="287"><Chemical>Telmisartan</Chemical><PMID>18664324</PMID><Author,  year>Tu, 2008</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Oocytes</Species/cell type><Measurement>hERG</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>24.35</Outcome><Lower>19.29</Lower><Upper>29.41</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="288"><Chemical>Telmisartan</Chemical><PMID>18664324</PMID><Author,  year>Tu, 2008</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Oocytes</Species/cell type><Measurement>hKv1.5</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.82</Outcome><Lower>0.43</Lower><Upper>1.21</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>1.5 second end-pulse current</Remarks></row>
<row _id="289"><Chemical>Tributyl phosphate (TBP)</Chemical><PMID>25661707</PMID><Author,  year>Du, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vivo</Study type><Species/cell type>Zebrafish</Species/cell type><Measurement>Pericardium effusion</Measurement><Timepoint>96h</Timepoint><Effect measure>EC50</Effect measure><Outcome>66.5</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="290"><Chemical>Triethyl phosphate (TEP)</Chemical><PMID>25661707</PMID><Author,  year>Du, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vivo</Study type><Species/cell type>Zebrafish</Species/cell type><Measurement>Pericardium effusion</Measurement><Timepoint>96h</Timepoint><Effect measure>EC50</Effect measure><Outcome>6820.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="291"><Chemical>Triphenyl phosphate (TPhP)</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>10.05</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in viable cell count from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="292"><Chemical>Triphenyl phosphate (TPhP)</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Mitochondrial dysfunction</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>0.682448714400104</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in granule intensity (JC-10) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="293"><Chemical>Triphenyl phosphate (TPhP)</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>30m</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>1.9162149312627903</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="294"><Chemical>Triphenyl phosphate (TPhP)</Chemical><PMID>28259702</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak frequency (beats per minute)</Measurement><Timepoint>24h</Timepoint><Effect measure>1 SD from control mean</Effect measure><Outcome>18.377242139483506</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Point of departure: one standard deviation difference in peak frequency (BPM) from control mean.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="295"><Chemical>Triphenyl phosphate (TPhP)</Chemical><PMID>25661707</PMID><Author,  year>Du, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vivo</Study type><Species/cell type>Zebrafish</Species/cell type><Measurement>Pericardium effusion</Measurement><Timepoint>96h</Timepoint><Effect measure>EC50</Effect measure><Outcome>1.97</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="296"><Chemical>Tripropyl phosphate (TPrP)</Chemical><PMID>25661707</PMID><Author,  year>Du, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vivo</Study type><Species/cell type>Zebrafish</Species/cell type><Measurement>Pericardium effusion</Measurement><Timepoint>96h</Timepoint><Effect measure>EC50</Effect measure><Outcome>933.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="297"><Chemical>Tris-(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCPP)</Chemical><PMID>25661707</PMID><Author,  year>Du, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vivo</Study type><Species/cell type>Zebrafish</Species/cell type><Measurement>Pericardium effusion</Measurement><Timepoint>96h</Timepoint><Effect measure>EC50</Effect measure><Outcome>3.83</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="298"><Chemical>Tris-(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (TBEP)</Chemical><PMID>25661707</PMID><Author,  year>Du, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vivo</Study type><Species/cell type>Zebrafish</Species/cell type><Measurement>Pericardium effusion</Measurement><Timepoint>96h</Timepoint><Effect measure>EC50</Effect measure><Outcome>10.3</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="299"><Chemical>Tris-(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP)</Chemical><PMID>25661707</PMID><Author,  year>Du, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vivo</Study type><Species/cell type>Zebrafish</Species/cell type><Measurement>Pericardium effusion</Measurement><Timepoint>96h</Timepoint><Effect measure>EC50</Effect measure><Outcome>626.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="300"><Chemical>Tris-(2-chloropropyl) phosphate (TCPP)</Chemical><PMID>25661707</PMID><Author,  year>Du, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vivo</Study type><Species/cell type>Zebrafish</Species/cell type><Measurement>Pericardium effusion</Measurement><Timepoint>96h</Timepoint><Effect measure>EC50</Effect measure><Outcome>69.5</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="301"><Chemical>Verapamil</Chemical><PMID>22972846</PMID><Author,  year>Sirenko, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.055</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="302"><Chemical>Verapamil</Chemical><PMID>25237062</PMID><Author,  year>Scott, 2014</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak amplitude</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>7.25</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Decrease in amplitude</Remarks></row>
<row _id="303"><Chemical>Verapamil</Chemical><PMID>25237062</PMID><Author,  year>Scott, 2014</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>7.44</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="304"><Chemical>Verapamil</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ current</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.32</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>L-type calcium channel inhibitor</Remarks></row>
<row _id="305"><Chemical>Verapamil</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ peak count</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.315762326666667</Outcome><Lower>0.1</Lower><Upper>0.64</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Peak count: number of contractions over a period of time.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="306"><Chemical>Verapamil</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient width</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.07754059017887538</Outcome><Lower>0.01</Lower><Upper>0.13</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Width of the calcium transient</Remarks></row>
<row _id="307"><Chemical>Verapamil</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient amplitude</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.0212289733333333</Outcome><Lower>0.01</Lower><Upper>0.03</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Peak amplitude of the calcium peak as measurement for contractility</Remarks></row>
<row _id="308"><Chemical>Verapamil</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient rise time</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.13900017643224588</Outcome><Lower>0.01</Lower><Upper>0.2</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="309"><Chemical>Verapamil</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient decay time</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.0349676443728653</Outcome><Lower>0.02</Lower><Upper>0.04</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="310"><Chemical>Verapamil</Chemical><PMID>25538221</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2015</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Ca2+ transient spacing</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.019115175830544666</Outcome><Lower>0.01</Lower><Upper>0.03</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="311"><Chemical>Verapamil</Chemical><PMID>26983082</PMID><Author,  year>Gossmann, 2016</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak amplitude</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>150.0</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Peak amplitude of the contraction peak.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="312"><Chemical>Verapamil</Chemical><PMID>28069985</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>3D cardiac microtissue (hiPSC-CMs, hCMECs, hCFs)</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak amplitude</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>5.16</Outcome><Lower>2.02</Lower><Upper>13.1</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Peak amplitude of the contraction peak.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="313"><Chemical>Verapamil</Chemical><PMID>28069985</PMID><Author,  year>Pointon, 2017</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>3D cardiac microtissue (hiPSC-CMs, hCMECs, hCFs)</Species/cell type><Measurement>Peak count</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>0.1690375987746757</Outcome><Lower>0.15883350098270407</Lower><Upper>42</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Peak count: number of contractions over a period of time.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="314"><Chemical>Verapamil</Chemical><PMID>33078833</PMID><Author,  year>Blanchette, 2020</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Cell viability</Measurement><Timepoint>90 min</Timepoint><Effect measure>TDVF05</Effect measure><Outcome>5.87</Outcome><Lower>2.19</Lower><Upper>26.6</Upper><Unit>42</Unit><Remarks>TDVF05: toxicodynamic variability factor. Ratio between the effective concentration (EC) for the median individual and that for a sensitive individual (5th percentile of the population), see ref. No EC values were reported.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="315"><Chemical>Verapamil</Chemical><PMID>21328588</PMID><Author,  year>Mandenius, 2011</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>HL-1</Species/cell type><Measurement>Respiration</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>EC50</Effect measure><Outcome>32.0</Outcome><Lower>31.0</Lower><Upper>36</Upper><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="316"><Chemical>Verapamil</Chemical><PMID>24585781</PMID><Author,  year>Stoehr, 2014</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>Cardiac construct, hiPSC</Species/cell type><Measurement>Contractility</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IC50</Effect measure><Outcome>968.1</Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>nM</Unit><Remarks /></row>
<row _id="317"><Chemical>Verapamil</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Arrhythmia</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>IB20</Effect measure><Outcome>&gt; 30 </Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced =&gt;20% arrhythmic beats in 3 consecutive 20s sweeps.</Remarks></row>
<row _id="318"><Chemical>Verapamil</Chemical><PMID>24052561</PMID><Author,  year>Guo, 2013</Author,  year><Study type>in vitro</Study type><Species/cell type>hiPSC-CMs</Species/cell type><Measurement>Beat rate</Measurement><Timepoint /><Effect measure>BR20</Effect measure><Outcome>(↑) 0.03 </Outcome><Lower /><Upper xsi:nil="true" /><Unit>µM</Unit><Remarks>Lowest dose that induced a reduction in beat rate of =&gt;20% at 3 consecutive sweeps compared with control.</Remarks></row>
</data>
